Obama Throws Israel to the Dogs

by Robert Spencer

America is on the verge of abandoning its most reliable ally in the Middle East, thanks to Barack Hussein Obama.

He began his betrayal with lip service to Israel’s concerns about defending itself from the relentless jihad that has been waged against it throughout the sixty-three years of its lifetime as a sovereign state: “For the Palestinians, efforts to delegitimize Israel will end in failure. Symbolic actions to isolate Israel at the United Nations in September won’t create an independent state. Palestinian leaders will not achieve peace or prosperity if Hamas insists on a path of terror and rejection. And Palestinians will never realize their independence by denying the right of Israel to exist.”

Yet after saying that “Palestinians will never realize their independence by denying the right of Israel to exist,” Obama called for the establishment of a Palestinian state. Yet neither Hamas nor Fatah have acknowledged Israel’s right to exist, and Obama did not make that acknowledgment a condition of the establishment of a Palestinian state. He was merely making an observation, akin to something like: “You’ll never get a good job by sleeping in the sun all day” – more on the order of a polite request, a mild nag, rather than a firm condition.

Obama also called for “two states,” explaining that “the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states.”

It was widely reported Thursday evening that Obama was calling for a return to the 1967 borders, but this is not the case. He actually called for the creation of a “sovereign and contiguous state” for the Palestinian Arabs, and said that “the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines.” Thus he wasn’t calling for a return to the 1967 lines, but new borders “based on the 1967 lines.”

There were, however, no 1967 lines in which Palestinian Arab territory was contiguous. For the territory of Palestine to be contiguous, that of Israel will have to be substantially reduced. Israel’s 1967 borders were indefensible, and Obama is calling for Israel to be reduced even further so that a contiguous Palestinian state can be established.

What’s more, Obama specified that the new Palestinian state should have “borders with Israel, Jordan, and Egypt,” while Israel should have “borders with Palestine.” The implication was that Israel, in Obama’s vision, will border on neither Jordan nor Egypt — only on “Palestine.” Yet currently Israel has substantial borders with both Jordan and Egypt. Obama was implying that his contiguous Palestine would comprise not just Gaza and Judea and Samaria, but large expanses of Israeli territory bordering on those two states.

That would leave a truncated, reduced Israeli rump state, reminiscent of the reduced and defenseless Czechoslovakia that remained after Neville Chamberlain fed the Nazi beast at Munich. And if Obama did not mean that the diminished Israel he envisioned would have no territory bordering on Jordan or Egypt, the establishment of a contiguous Palestinian state including Gaza and the West Bank would cut Israel in two: Palestine’s contiguous territory would come at the expense of Israel’s.

Whatever Obama meant about Israel’s borders, the establishment of a Palestinian state will come at the expense of Israel’s security. It will not make for peace any more than the withdrawal from Gaza did. In those days the learned analysts were predicting that a withdrawal from Gaza would pacify the Palestinians and normalize their sick society. I said, in contrast, that it would just be another jihad base for more attacks on Israel. That’s what it became. And that’s what a Palestinian state would be also.

The Kuwaiti MP Jama’an Al-Harbash summed it up on Al-Jazeera on March 29, 2010. First he quoted the notorious genocidal hadith in which Muhammad predicts a Muslim genocide of Jews: “Allah willing, a war will be waged between us and them – the war foretold by the Prophet Muhammad: ‘Judgment Day will not come before you fight the Jews – with them on the west bank of the river, and you on the east bank – and the trees and the stones will say: Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me. Come and kill him.’ This war is drawing near, Allah willing.”

With eerie prescience, al-Harbash then declared of the now-toppled regimes in the Middle East that “the countries of surrender and appeasement, and those who have forsaken the holy places and the land, in their efforts to cling to their seats and pass them on [to their sons] – they will be trampled underfoot by the mujahideen.”

Finally al-Harbash explained the nature of the conflict: “This is a war of religion, not just a war between Arabs and Israelis, or a war between liberators and occupiers. This is an ideological war, an Islamic war, which will end in victory only under the banner of Jihad.”

Those who believe that will not be pacified by the creation of a Palestinian state. They will not lay down their arms and accept Israel’s existence, even its truncated, bisected existence, because the Palestinians have statehood. Not only will they not be pacified; they will be emboldened – emboldened to fight on against their bloodied and weakened adversary. Emboldened to move in for the kill.

Obama’s Thursday address thus amounted to a betrayal of Israel, and an attempt to sign its death warrant. Binyamin Netanyahu immediately issued a statement saying that he was going to seek “a reaffirmation from President Obama of U.S. commitments made to Israel in 2004, which were overwhelmingly supported by both Houses of Congress,” including commitments about Israel “not having to withdraw to the 1967 lines which are both indefensible and which would leave major Israeli population centers in Judea and Samaria beyond those lines.”

Will Obama honor this request? Unlikely. But it is good that it is going to be made. Netanyahu has made clear that Israel will not acquiesce to Obama’s betrayal and go gently into the night.

And so now more than ever, all free people must stand with Israel.

Robert Spencer is a scholar of Islamic history, theology, and law and the director of Jihad Watch. He is the author of ten books, eleven monographs, and hundreds of articles about jihad and Islamic terrorism, including the New York Times Bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book is The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran (Regnery), and he is coauthor (with Pamela Geller) of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America (Simon http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifand Schuster).



Read More:
Front Page Magazine

Obama's Next Failure

President fails to understand that PA has no desire, ability to secure deal with Israel.

by Moshe Elad

The electoral defeat suffered by US President Barack Obama is not supposed to be connected to events in the Middle East. Seemingly, his downfall was a result of domestic policy failures. However, when examining Obama's relationship with Abbas and Netanyahu, it's hard not to conclude that on this front too, the US president can expect to lick some wounds.

Obama and his advisors fail to understand that that the Middle East crisis cannot be resolved with "Yes we can" slogans. Several previous presidents realized that the issue is complex, problematic, and beyond their abilities, thereby taking a step back. But not Obama. He will continue to exert pressure until he prompts a collapse, which would mean either a new flare-up, or escaping Palestinian Authority leaders.

What is misleading Obama and his people to such extent? Seemingly, the West Bank presents a positive, encouraging façade: Security calm for the most part, hundreds of projects being built on the ground, reduced unemployment, and a growth rate that hasn't been seen in years. However, all these optimistic indications, most of which are economic, are only the storefront.

Behind the Palestinian façade we discover a very grim picture of despair and frustration. On the one hand, the Palestinian Authority has neither the desire nor the ability to reach a historic compromise with Israel. On the other hand, the PA is having trouble withstanding the American and European pressure to implement such compromise.

Obama fails to understand that as long as Hamas breathes down Abbas' neck, the latter would not be able to realize America's objectives.

Why so?

The name of the game in the territories is zeal. To our regret, at this time the zeal is not found among Abbas and his people, but rather, among Hamas members. We saw it already in the June 2007 events in Gaza. The PLO is perceived as satiated, corrupt and anachronistic, while the Palestinian public is eager for hungry, thin leadership with zeal, regardless of the ideology it represents. For example, should Ahmadinejad present a Palestinian alternative, even he could represent the Palestinians.

Obama and his people are pushing Abbas to stop the incitement against Israel. How exactly can this be done? After all, generations of incitement cannot be erased with mere declarations. Abbas himself does not believe in putting an end to incitement, as it would quickly prompt greater support for Hamas.

Israel to pay price
Very few Palestinians believe Abbas when he proposes, with US encouragement, the handover of areas under Israeli security control to the PA. Most Palestinians understand that the moment the IDF leaves any West Bank town, it may fall into the hands of Hamas, which will enlist the help of apolitical gangs.

Obama's gamble on Abbas as the Palestinian leader disregards not only his failure to control the Gaza Strip, but also his inability to fully control the West Bank. There are towns and villages in the West Bank that President Abbas, is afraid to go into – mostly traditional Hamas strongholds or areas controlled by gangs. This isn't a president – it’s an "exiled ruler."

A harsh debate emerged following the 'You have a partner' campaign, where Israeli elements presented PA leaders as friends of Israel. This campaign provoked great displeasure among residents of the territories and further eroded the PA’s status. 'How can you call for ongoing armed conflict against peace partners?' Abbas was asked by those who wanted to highlight the doublespeak custom he adopted, just like his predecessor Arafat.

Meanwhile, the sight of security personnel destroying settlement products prompted ridicule, at most, among many Palestinians. 'After all, there isn't one settlement in the West Bank that was not built by the Palestinians,' say those who object to these ostentatious moves, adding that 'some senior PA officials made their fortunes through 'banned trade with settlers, so who are you trying to fool here?'

The underground current simmering in the territories threatens to turn into a huge wave that would topple Abbas and his people. Some more pressure from Obama would see Abbas declaring 'let me die with Palestine.' And then, the American president will dispatch his spokesman to say: We tried, but it didn't work. We'll have to fix it.

In any case, Israel will be paying the price for it.




Ynew News

Obama - Politics or Ideology?

Following expected elections defeat, Obama will find himself at political crossroads.

by Yitzhak Benhorin

Part 2 of analysis

If all the other troubles are not enough for President Obama, he and the Democrats also lost the support of the business sector. The legislation he initiated in a bid to reinforce the monitoring of Wall Street, and his efforts to impose taxes on the rich and protect the middle class exacted a heavy price on his plan to rehabilitate America’s economy.

Despite the economic crisis, those who think there is no money available in America are gravely mistaken. Immense sums of money are currently frozen in the large banks and major corporations, which are hesitant to invest it and stimulate the economy as long as Obama threatens to impose legislation and taxes that may harm them. The bitter result is that the economy is on hold, while Obama and the Democrats pay the price in the November elections.

The money that is changing hands within the economic elite is meant to deliver a grave blow to the ruling party. The Supreme Court contributed to this situation when it permitted companies and individuals to donate money to campaigns without revealing their identities. The ability to act discreetly and without financial limits enabled America’s wealthy, ranging from the air-conditioned office dwellers in Wall Street to the oil drillers in Texas to dramatically affect the current elections campaign; the same will apparently happen in the next presidential elections.

An astronomical sum of $3 billion had been poured into election ads in recent weeks. A quick glimpse at the TV set shows that the Republicans hold a major advantage over the Democrats. Just to illustrate, a group led by Karl Rove, former President George W. Bush’s senior advisor, easily poured $250 million into the campaign.

Jimmy or Bill?
In the first half of his term in office, Obama did things that many presidents before him did not: He successfully advanced revolutionary laws to stimulate the economy, approved a historical healthcare reform, and reinforced the monitoring of Wall Street’s dark corners.

The voters want to see immediate results, yet the fruits of Obama’s labor will only be evident years from now. Similarly, the healthcare reform is a complex process, whose achievements will only become apparent in the future.

On November 3rd, when America wakes up to a new Congress and new governors, the presidential election campaign shall in fact get underway. The great political question (with the answer to be provided only two years from now) is what kind of Obama will be sitting in the White House 11 days from now. Will he follow in the footsteps of Bill Clinton, who lost the Democratic majority in Congress and realized he has no choice but to shift to the Center? Or will he follow the example of Jimmy Carter, who insisted on promoting a liberal agenda?

Obama has already attempted to provide excuses for the expected November defeat, arguing that he was too busy with policy and abandoned politics. Indeed, this is the dilemma between the Clinton way and the Carter way: The former internalized the lessons of the Congress defeat in 1994, chose politics, and was elected for a second term in office. The latter stuck to his truth, chose to go ahead with his policy, and was kicked out of the White House after four years.


You Might Also Like to Read:
Obama in Trouble



Ynet News

0bamas' Hidden Records

0bamas' hidden records: Why are these off limits?

1 Certified copy of original birth certificate
2 Columbia University transcripts
3 Columbia thesis paper
4 Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5 Harvard University transcripts
6 Illinois State Senate records
7 Illinois State Senate schedule
8 Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9 Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mother
10 Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11 Occidental College Transcripts
12 Parent’s marriage Certificate
13 Record of baptism
14 Selective Service registration records
(Did Obama Actually Register for Selective Service?
This supposed revelation of 0's SS records has been debunked here and here.)
15 Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16 Passport records for all passports
17 Scholarly articles
18 SAT and LSAT test scores
19 Access to his grandmother in Kenya
20 List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists
21 Punahou grade school records
22 Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education.
23 Obama 1964 Divorce Papers - 13 Pages - Missing Pg 11
24 Why isn't Barack Obama still a member of the Illinois bar and where are all of the relevant documents?
25 Why isn't Michelle Obama still a member of the Illinois bar, after only about four years of practice, and where are all of the relevant documents?

Anyone who cares about their country would be very concerned that a POTUS had hidden every scrap of information of his life that he possibly could.



City of Hypocrisy

GUESS WHO I AM...

* I was born inone country, raised in another. My father was born in another country, I was not his only child. He fathered several children with numerous women..

* I became very close to my mother, asmy father showed no interest in me. My mother died at anearly age from cancer.

* Later in life, questions arose over my real name.

* My birth records were sketchy and no one was able to produce a legitimate, reliable birth certificate.

* I grew up practicing one faith but converted to Christianity,as it was widely accepted in my country, but I practiced non-traditional beliefs & didn't follow Christianity, except in the public eye under scrutiny.

* I worked and lived among lower-class people as a young adult, disguising myself as someone who really cared about them..

* That was before I decided it was time to get serious about my life and I embarked on a new career.

* I wrote a book about my struggles growing up. It was clear to those who read my memoirsthat I had difficulties accepting that my father abandoned me as a child.

* I became active in local politics in my 30's then with help behind the scenes, I literally burst on to the scene as a candidate for national office in my 40s. They said I had a golden tongue and could talk anyone into anything. That reinforced my conceit.

* I had a virtually non-existent resume, little work history, and no experience in leading asingle organization. Yet I was a powerful speaker and citizens were drawn to me as though I were a magnet and theywere small roofing tacks.

* I drew incredibly large crowds during my public appearances. This bolstered my ego.

* At first, my political campaign focused on my country's foreign policy. I was very critical of my country in the last war and seized every opportunity to bash my country.

* But what launched my rise to national prominence were my views on the country's economy. I pretended to have a really good plan on how we could do better and every poor person would be fed & housed for free.

* I knew which group was responsible for getting us into this mess. It was the free market, banks & corporations. I decided to start making citizens hate them and if they were envious of others whodid well, the plan was clinched tight.

* I called mine "A People's Campaign" and that sounded good to all people.

* I was the surprise candidate becauseI emerged from outside the traditional path of politics& was able to gain widespread popular support.

* I knew that, if I merely offered the people "hope" , together we could change our country and the world.

* So, I started to make my speeches sound like they were on behalf of the downtrodden, poor, ignorant to include "persecuted minorities". My true views were not widely known & I needed to keep them unknown, until after I became my nation's leader.

* I had to carefully guard reality, as anybody could have easily found out what I really believed, if they had simply read my writings and examined thosepeople I associated with.

* I'm glad they didn't. Then I became the most powerful man in the world. And the world learned the truth.

WHO AM I?



I am ADOLF HITLER. WHO WERE YOU THINKING OF?
Common, don't tell me that you thought about Obama.
Scary, isn't it?

I also deserve a Nobel Prize

In wake of Obama win, Yoaz Hendel recommends himself for Nobel Prize in Literature
~Yoaz Hendel~

Dear head of the Nobel Prize Committee:
I am turning to you with an unusual request. After much thinking and great deliberations, I have reached the conclusion – with all due modesty – that I too deserve to join the ranks of Nobel Prize laureates.

Unlike US President Barack Obama, who won the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize, I would like to warmly recommend myself for the Nobel Prize in Literature.

I believe the facts speak for themselves: For the past few years, I have been crafting, in my head, an incredible novel coupled with some plot lines as well;
I believe this novel will position me alongside literary giants such as Dostoyevsky.

This novel may deeply affect the enlightened world’s cultural perception. In my mind’s eye I see how youngsters eagerly and passionately reading it, while the elderly zealously debate it at local cultural centers.

Indeed, dear sir, you and your colleagues at the committee have the power to expose this literary cocoon to the world, encourage its immense potential, and all this through a simple gesture and reasonable sum of money.

And as we are already dealing with potential, I was amazed when this year too you refrained from turning to my highly talented neighbor, Miriam, whose homemade remedies improve the health state of all residents in our building. Had she only been granted the Nobel Prize for Medicine, proper funding, and the accompanying publicity, she would have certainly gone on to improve the lives of everyone around here: Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike.

President Obama certainly deserves prizes in many areas: He deserves to win the rhetoric prize for this decade, he deserves the prize for the best election campaign ever seen since the invention of democracy, and he is even worthy of a prize for original thinking in a world overcome by diplomatic stalemate.

It appears that only one area moved further away from him given the past year’s realities – the area of peace. In Iraq (where Obama started withdrawing forces) we saw more than 100 victims of peace killed this past week in a murderous terror attack. In Afghanistan, the war is merely escalating, despite unrealistic withdrawal dates. Meanwhile, on the Iranian front, Obama’s diplomatic tactics are pushing the entire Middle East to the brink of war.

So if officials in Sweden and Norway are truly interested in peace, perhaps they would do well to grant the prize to someone who is in fact willing to embark on war – that way, at least there will be no doubt that the bloody “era of potential” will be ending sometimes.



By: Ynet - Israel's News

In wake of Obama win Nobel Prize

In wake of Obama win, Yoaz Hendel recommends himself for Nobel Prize in Literature
~Yoaz Hendel~

Dear head of the Nobel Prize Committee:
I am turning to you with an unusual request. After much thinking and great deliberations, I have reached the conclusion – with all due modesty – that I too deserve to join the ranks of Nobel Prize laureates.

Unlike US President Barack Obama, who won the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize, I would like to warmly recommend myself for the Nobel Prize in Literature.

I believe the facts speak for themselves: For the past few years, I have been crafting, in my head, an incredible novel coupled with some plot lines as well;
I believe this novel will position me alongside literary giants such as Dostoyevsky.

This novel may deeply affect the enlightened world’s cultural perception. In my mind’s eye I see how youngsters eagerly and passionately reading it, while the elderly zealously debate it at local cultural centers.

Indeed, dear sir, you and your colleagues at the committee have the power to expose this literary cocoon to the world, encourage its immense potential, and all this through a simple gesture and reasonable sum of money.

And as we are already dealing with potential, I was amazed when this year too you refrained from turning to my highly talented neighbor, Miriam, whose homemade remedies improve the health state of all residents in our building. Had she only been granted the Nobel Prize for Medicine, proper funding, and the accompanying publicity, she would have certainly gone on to improve the lives of everyone around here: Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike.

President Obama certainly deserves prizes in many areas: He deserves to win the rhetoric prize for this decade, he deserves the prize for the best election campaign ever seen since the invention of democracy, and he is even worthy of a prize for original thinking in a world overcome by diplomatic stalemate.

It appears that only one area moved further away from him given the past year’s realities – the area of peace. In Iraq (where Obama started withdrawing forces) we saw more than 100 victims of peace killed this past week in a murderous terror attack. In Afghanistan, the war is merely escalating, despite unrealistic withdrawal dates. Meanwhile, on the Iranian front, Obama’s diplomatic tactics are pushing the entire Middle East to the brink of war.

So if officials in Sweden and Norway are truly interested in peace, perhaps they would do well to grant the prize to someone who is in fact willing to embark on war – that way, at least there will be no doubt that the bloody “era of potential” will be ending sometimes.



By: Ynet - Israel's News

Obama's Treatment of Israel is Shocking

By Ed Koch

President Obama's abysmal attitude toward the State of Israel and his humiliating treatment of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is shocking. In the Washington Post on March 24th, Jackson Diehl wrote, "Obama has added more poison to a U.S.-Israeli relationship that already was at its lowest point in two decades. Tuesday night the White House refused to allow non-official photographers record the president's meeting with Netanyahu; no statement was issued afterward. Netanyahu is being treated as if he were an unsavory Third World dictator, needed for strategic reasons but conspicuously held at arms length. That is something the rest of the world will be quick to notice and respond to."

I have not heard or read statements criticizing the president by New York Senators Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand or many other supporters of Israel for his blatantly hostile attitude toward Israel and his discourtesy displayed at the White House. President Obama orchestrated the hostile statements of Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, voiced by Biden in Israel and by Clinton in a 43-minute telephone call to Bibi Netanyahu, and then invited the latter to the White House to further berate him. He then left Prime Minister Netanyahu to have dinner at the White House with his family, conveying he would only be available to meet again if Netanyahu had further information - read concessions - to impart.

It is unimaginable that the President would treat any of our NATO allies, large or small, in such a degrading fashion. That there are policy differences between the U.S. and the Netanyahu government is no excuse. Allies often disagree, but remain respectful.

In portraying Israel as the cause of the lack of progress in the peace process, President Obama ignores the numerous offers and concessions that Israel has made over the years for the sake of peace, and the Palestinians' repeated rejections of those offers. Not only have Israel's peace proposals, which include ceding virtually the entire West Bank and parts of Jerusalem to the Palestinians, been rejected, but each Israeli concession has been met with even greater demands, no reciprocity, and frequently horrific violence directed at Israeli civilians. Thus, Prime Minister Netanyahu's agreement to suspend construction on the West Bank - a move heralded by Secretary of State Clinton as unprecedented by an Israeli government - has now led to a demand that Israel also halt all construction in East Jerusalem, which is part of Israel's capital. Meanwhile, Palestinians are upping the ante, with violent protests in Jerusalem and elsewhere. And the Obama administration's request that our Arab allies make some conciliatory gesture towards Israel has fallen on deaf ears.

Prior American presidents, beginning with Truman who recognized the State of Israel in 1948, have valued Israel as a close ally and have often come to its rescue. For example, it was Richard Nixon during the 1973 war, who resupplied Israel with arms, making it possible for it to snatch victory from a potentially devastating defeat at the hands of a coalition of Arab countries including Egypt and Syria.

President George W. Bush made it a point of protecting Israel at the United Nations and the Security Council wielding the U.S. veto against the unfair actions and sanctions that Arab countries sought to impose to cripple and, if possible, destroy, the one Jewish nation in the world. Now, in my opinion, based on the actions and statements by President Obama and members of his administration, there is grave doubt among supporters of Israel that President Obama can be counted on to do what presidents before him did - protect our ally, Israel. The Arabs can lose countless wars and still come back because of their numbers. If Israel were to lose one, it would cease to exist.

To its credit, Congress, according to the Daily News, has acted differently towards Prime Minister Netanyahu than President Obama. Reporter Richard Sisk wrote on March 24th, "Congress put on a rare show of bipartisanship for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday - a sharp contrast to his chilly reception at the White House. ‘We in Congress stand by Israel,' House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told a beaming Netanyahu, who has refused to budge on White House and State Department demands to freeze settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank."

But Congress does not make foreign policy. It can prevent military arms from going to Israel, but cannot send them. Congress has no role in determining U.S. policy at the U.N. Security Council. The President of the United States determines our foreign policy - nearly unilaterally - under our Constitution. So those Congressional bipartisan wishes of support, while welcome, will not protect Israel in these areas, only the President can do that. Based on his actions to date, I have serious doubts.

In the 1930s, the Jewish community and its leadership, with few exceptions, were silent when their coreligionists were being attacked, hunted down, incarcerated and slaughtered. Ultimately 6 million Jews were exterminated in the Holocaust. The feeling in the U.S. apparently was that Jews who criticized our country's actions and inactions that endangered the lives of other Jews would be considered disloyal, unpatriotic and displaying dual loyalty, so many Jews stayed mute. Never again should we allow that to occur. We have every right to be concerned about the fate of the only Jewish nation in the world, which if it had existed during the 1930s and thereafter, would have given sanctuary to any Jew escaping the Nazi holocaust and taken whatever military action it could to save Jews not yet in the clutches of the Nazis. We who have learned the lessons of silence, Jews and Christians alike, must speak up now before it is too late.

So I ask again, where are our Senators, Schumer and Gillibrand? And, where are the voices, not only of the 31 members of the House and 14 Senators who are Jewish, but the Christian members of the House and Senate who support the State of Israel? Where are the peoples' voices? Remember the words of Pastor Niemoller, so familiar that I will not recite them, except for the last line, "Then they came for me, and by that time, there was no one left to speak up."

Supporters of Israel who gave their votes to candidate Obama - 78 percent of the Jewish community did - believing he would provide the same support as John McCain, this is the time to speak out and tell the President of your disappointment in him. It seems to me particularly appropriate to do so on the eve of the Passover. It is one thing to disagree with certain policies of the Israeli government. It is quite another to treat Israel and its prime minister as pariahs, which only emboldens Israel's enemies and makes the prospect of peace even more remote. ~Ed Koch is the former Mayor of New York City.~

Obama's 50 Lies (complete with documented proof)

1) Selma Got Me Born - WRONG!
Your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965.

2) Father Was A Goat Herder - WRONG!
He was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.

3) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - WRONG!
He was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.

4) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - WRONG!
Your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya . It is the first widespread violence in decades.

5) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - WRONG!
She does her daily Salat prayers at 5am according to her own interviews. According to the New York Times: 'I am a strong believer of the Islamic faith,' Ms. Obama, 85, said in a recent interview in Kenya.' Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.

6) My Name is African Swahili - WRONG!
Your name is Arabic and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.

7) I Never Practiced Islam - WRONG!
You practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years,until your wife made you change, so you could run for office.

8) My School In Indonesia Was Christian - WRONG!
You were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book).

9) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - WRONG!
Not one teacher says you could speak the language.

10) Because I Lived In Indonesia, I Have More Foreign Experience - WRONG!
You were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn't even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons.

11) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - WRONG!
Except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies. You seek to disarm America while our avowed enemy, Iran, will not subject itself to a nuclear ban. Top Hamas political adviser Ahmed Yousef said the Hamas terrorist group 'supports Obama's foreign policy vision'.

12) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - WRONG!
You were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.

13)An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - WRONG!
Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.

14) A Life Magazine Article Changed My Outlook On Life - WRONG!
Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.

15) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 - WRONG!
Here you are, despite saying, live on TV, that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.

16) Present Votes Are Common In Illinois - WRONG!
They are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO VOTES.

17) Oops, I Misvoted - WRONG!
Only when caught by church groups and Democrats, did you beg to change your misvote.

18) I Was A Professor Of Law - WRONG!
You were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.

19) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - WRONG!
You were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.

20) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - WRONG!
You didn't write it,introduce it, change it, or create it.

21) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - WRONG!
It took just 14 days from start to finish.

22) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - WRONG!
Your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear Donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.

23) I Have Released My State Records - WRONG!
As of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.

24) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - WRONG!
You were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens . You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books.

25) My Economics Bill Will Help America - WRONG!
Your 111 economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill.

26) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - WRONG!
Even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.

27) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - WRONG!
They were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.

28) No One Contacted Canada About NAFTA - WRONG!
The Canadian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.

29) I Am Tough On Terrorism - WRONG!
You missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of Israel. You state you will open friendly communication with the Leader of Iran who is attempting to develop nuclear weapons to destroy us, but refuse to speak to FOX news. You are against provisions of the Patriot act which would all wiretapping of the phones of suspected terrorists in the USA .

30) I Am Not Acting As President Yet - WRONG!
After the NAFTA Memo, a dead terrorist in the FARC, in Colombia, was found with a letter stating how you and he were working together on getting FARC recognized officially.

31) I Didn't Run Ads In Florida - WRONG!
You allowed national ads to run 8-12 times per day for two weeks - and you still lost.

32) I Won Michigan - WRONG!
No you didn't.

33) I won Nevada - WRONG!
No you did not.

34) I Want All Votes To Count - WRONG!
You said let the delegates decide.

35) I Want Americans To Decide - WRONG!
You prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.

36) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - WRONG!
You passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself.

37) My Campaign Was Extorted By A Friend - WRONG!
That friend is threatening to sue if you do not stop saying this. Obama has stopped saying this.

38) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - WRONG!
You used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.

39) I Don't Take PAC Money - WRONG!
You take loads of it.

40) I don't Have Lobbysists - WRONG!
You have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.

41) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - WRONG!
Your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.

42) My Campaign Never Took Over MySpace - WRONG!
Tom, who started MySpace issued a warning about this advertising to MySpace clients.

43) I Inspire People With My Words - WRONG!
You inspire people with other people's words.

44) I Have Passed Bills In The U.S. Senate -WRONG!
You have passed A BILL in the U.S. Senate - for Africa , which shows YOUR priorities.

45) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - WRONG!
You weren't in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time, unlike Kucinich,who seems to be out gutting you Obama. You also seem to be stepping back
from your departure date - AGAIN.

46) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - WRONG!
Your plan leaves us all to pay the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it.

47) I Only Found Out About My Investment Conflicts Via Mail - WRONG!
Both companies you site as having sent you letters about this conflict have no record of any such letter ever being created or sent.

48) I Am As Patriotic As Anyone - WRONG!
You won't wear a flag pin and you don't put your hand over your heart during the Anthem. There is a Cuban Flag with Che Guevara Displayed at Barack Obama Campaign Office which you allow to be displayed. You voted against making English the official language of the United States .You voted to give illegal aliens social security benefits, which would bankrupt the social security system for Americans legally paying into it.

49) My Wife Didn't Mean What She Said About Pride In Country - WRONG!
Your wife's words follow lock-step in the vain of Rev. Wright and Louis Farrahkan, in relation to their contempt and hatred of America .

50) Wal-Mart Is A Company I Wouldn't Support - WRONG!
Your wife has received nearly a quarter of a million dollars through Treehouse, which is connected to Wal-Mart.





AFTER READING ALL THE ABOVE, HOW COULD ANY PERSON IN THEIR RIGHT MIND VOTE FOR THIS TYPE OF PERSON!?!?!?!

Read More: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message551740/pg1